Visitors / Гости

We have 7 guests online

Registration

The current issue of the Pushkin Review and other restricted resources on this site can only be viewed by members of the North American Pushkin Society.  To register for membership, please visit the "Subscriptions" link in the menu at the top of this page.
You are here: Home
Pushkinian Elements in Isaak Levitan's Painting "By the Mill-Pond"
Volume 06-07 (2003-04) - Vols. 6-7: Notes / Заметки
Written by Debreczeny, Paul   

Pushkinian Elements in Isaak levitan's Painting "By the Mill-Pond"

Paul Debreczeny

 

In December 1884, when Isaak Levitan was twenty-four and still had difficulties earning a living as a painter, his former teacher Vasilii Polenov arranged for him and a number of other young artists to work as designers for a private opera house established by the wealthy patron of the arts Savva Mamontov. At first a somewhat amateurish enterprise, Mamontov's opera soon grew into a serious aspect of Moscow's cultural landscape. It was here that Fedor Shaliapin, one of Russia's most famous singers, was to find his true artistic identity. Up to that time theater design had been left to little-known craftsmen. Mamontov, falling in with the practice of Art Nouveau, employed outstanding painters and made the decor as integral a part of the performance as singing, acting, and music. Levitan participated in designing stage sets for Alexander Dargomyzhskii's Water-Nymph (Rusalka), based on Pushkin's verse drama, for Nikolai Rimskii-Korsakov's Snow-Maiden (Snegurochka), Mikhail Glinka's Life for the Tsar (Zhizn' za tsaria), and Charles Gounod's Faust. For The Water-Nymph, which was put on as the theater's debut performance in January 1885, he painted the backdrop of the water-nymphs' underground palace. This revival of Dargomyzhskii's opera, written in 1855, met with great success; people went around singing the arias based on Pushkin's verses. It is characteristic that the students going to the red light district in Anton Chekhov's 1886 story "An Attack of Nerves" sing, ironically, the Prince's words in the last scene, "Here once upon a time I met with love, / A passionate and freely given love.”[1]

Read more...
 
«Музы наши сестры» (Пушкин и Вяземский)
Volume 06-07 (2003-04) - Vols. 6-7: Notes / Заметки
Written by Shokina, O. Iu.   

«Музы наши сестры» (Пушкин и Вяземский)

O. Ю. Шокина

Тема «Пушкин и Вяземский»—одна из самых интересных тем в пушкинистике и в литературоведении вообще. Многие исследователи обращались к этой теме, и интерес к ней не случаен и закономерен.

 

Петр Андреевич Вяземский (1792–1878), поэт и критик, был одним из ближайших друзей Пушкина на протяжении многих лет. Познакомившись в 1816 году, они могли долго не встречаться, но не теряли друг друга из виду, общаясь, если не лично, то в письмах. Кроме взаимной симпатии, их связывала и литературная деятельность; более того, «не лишено вероятия утверждение, что стихотворения В<яземского> влияли в известной мере на выработку поэтики Пушкина.»[1]

Read more...
 
Review: J. Douglas Clayton. «Dimitry's Shade: A Reading of Alexander Pushkin's "Boris Godunov"»
Volume 06-07 (2003-04) - Vols. 6-7: Reviews / Рецензии
Written by Emerson, Caryl   

J. Douglas Clayton. Dimitry's Shade: A Reading of Alexander Pushkin's "Boris Godunov." Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2003. xiv + 208 pp. ISBN 0810119382. Paper.

 

In this provocative new interpretation of Pushkin's most enigmatic work for the stage, Douglas Clayton makes contributions to literary history, genre studies, a domain he calls poetic or lexical semantics, and to the poet's religious-political worldview—in order of increasing vulnerability and breadth of claim. Of undisputed excellence, in this reviewer's opinion, are the opening chapters on Push kin's relation to the theater and to the dramatic genre system of European Romanticism. Chapter 2, on the “war of prefaces" waged by reformist French dramatists and especially by Victor Hugo in his 1827 forward to Cromwell, sheds much welcome light on Pushkin's sequence of unfinished, fragmentary "drafts for a preface" to Boris, which are read here almost as meditations on Hugo's concerns. It is refreshing throughout the book to have boilerplate Soviet-era misreadings refuted in such a competent way: the myth of Pushkin's passionate faith in the narod, for example, or the Marxist oversimplification of his complex working relationship with two emperors.

Read more...
 
Review: Чумаков, Юрий. «Стихотворная поэтика Пушкина».
Volume 06-07 (2003-04) - Vols. 6-7: Reviews / Рецензии
Written by Altshuller, Mark   

Чумаков, Юрий. Стихотворная поэтика Пушкина. Санкт-Петербург: Государственный пушкинский театральный центр, 1999. 432 с.

 

Я знаю Юрия Николаевича Чумакова лет тридцать пять. Уже первый услышанный мной давным-давно в далекой Вологде доклад о двух посланиях к Чаадаеву свидетельствовал об оригинальном и смелом подходе к пушкинским проблемам.

 

С тех пор я всегда с интересом слежу за его публикациями. В новой книге собраны основные работы этого известного ученого, которого В. Непомнящий недавно вполне справедливо назвал «выдающимся филологом, глубоким и блестящим знатоком Пушкина».[1]

Read more...
 
Review: Ian M. Helfant. «The High Stakes of Identity: Gambling in the Life and Literature of Nineteenth-Century Russia»
Volume 06-07 (2003-04) - Vols. 6-7: Reviews / Рецензии
Written by Finke, Michael   

Ian M. Helfant. The High Stakes of Identity: Gambling in the Life and Literature of Nineteenth-Century Russia. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2002. xxv + 211 pp. 0810118637. Cloth.

 

Now that Ian Helfant's volume on gambling in nineteenth-century Russian culture has appeared, one cannot help wondering how the topic remained unaddressed by a monograph in English until this point: gambling is without question one of the master themes of Russian literature of the period. It is central to many of the liveliest episodes in the biographies and texts of its great authors, and it certainly deserves treatment alongside such others as apocalyptic thinking, suicide, holy foolishness, dueling, nihilism—we could all complete such a list, and though contents might vary somewhat, gambling is sure to be present. Helfant's book has two particular merits: his approach follows the pattern of cultural studies in ranging beyond canonical literary texts to memoirs, popular literature, anti-gambling tracts, the historical record, and what can be reconstructed of common behavioral codes among the noble class; and his interpretive framework is very sharply defined and productive. In a fairly slim study he manages to put before the reader a wide variety of material, setting familial masterpieces beside rather obscure but fascinating sources, and he applies an interpretative lens that makes this material cohere remarkably well.

Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 2

©2010, all work published here remains the intellectual property of its author.
All rights reserved.